charles/supply
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Expand theory and virtual resource sections

Browse Source 
Add an introduction and elaborate on Agency Theory and its application
to cloud services. Additionally, expand the virtual resources chapter
with details on demand planning, mathematical optimization, and
resource fungibility.
This commit is contained in:
charles
2026-05-18 23:06:26 -07:00
parent 500b7d44cf
commit 8144e25263
5 changed files with 78 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
book/ch02_theories.md
+14 -2
View File
@@ -24,8 +24,20 @@ These theories provide the academic and strategic foundation for SCM, offering f
- **Asset Specificity & Lock-in:** Occurs when users adopt provider-specific APIs or proprietary formats (e.g., DynamoDB), increasing "switching costs."
## Agency Theory
- **General Purpose:** Examines the relationship between a 'principal' and an 'agent' and the conflicts of interest that arise when goals are misaligned.
- **Application to Virtual Resources:** Relevant in the context of SLAs (Service Level Agreements) and the governance of managed services where the provider (agent) manages resources for the user (principal).
- **General Purpose:** Explores the relationship where a **Principal** delegates authority to an **Agent**. The "Principal-Agent Problem" occurs when interests diverge and the principal cannot perfectly monitor the agent. This is driven by **Information Asymmetry**, leading to:
- **Adverse Selection**: Pre-contractual inability to determine agent competence, where an incompetent agent may misrepresent their capabilities to be selected.
- **Moral Hazard**: Post-contractual behavior where the agent acts in their own interest (e.g., shirking or cutting corners) because their actions are not fully observable to the principal.
- **Traditional SCM Application:** Highly prevalent in outsourcing and supplier relationship management where the buyer (Principal) delegates production to a supplier (Agent). To align interests, parties manage **Agency Costs**:
- **Monitoring Costs**: Expenses incurred by the principal to verify agent behavior (e.g., quality audits, on-site inspections).
- **Bonding Costs**: Expenses incurred by the agent to signal reliability and competence (e.g., performance bonds, ISO certifications).
- **Residual Loss**: The loss in value that occurs because agent decisions still deviate from the principal's ideal choice despite monitoring.
- **Application to Virtual Resources:** The **Cloud Customer (Principal)** and the **Cloud Service Provider (Agent)** relationship.
- **The Virtualization Gap**: The CSP has full visibility into physical hardware health and multi-tenancy, while the customer sees only a virtual abstraction. This creates a severe **Information Asymmetry**.
- **Virtual Moral Hazard**: Because the customer cannot see the "physical truth," the CSP may engage in behaviors maximizing their own profit, such as **aggressive overcommitment** (over-provisioning) or silent **resource throttling**.
- **SLA Governance**: Service Level Agreements (SLAs) serve as the primary mechanism to align incentives, using financial penalties (service credits) to shift the risk of moral hazard back to the provider.
- **Key References:**
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). *Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure*. Journal of Financial Economics.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). *Agency Theory in Organizational Research*. Academy of Management Review.
## Contingency Theory
- **General Purpose:** Suggests there is no single "best way" to manage a supply chain; the optimal approach depends on the internal and external situation.